Latest discussions in the Method of Levels Section in Discourse
- by @rupert Rupert YoungLuk, I come from a modelling perspective. That is, to show that PCT models can solve applications in a simpler and more elegant way than RL, for example. I have yet to see FEP being successfully applied to actual problems, though that might be my lack of knowledge. Are you aware of examples of FEP […]
- by @rsmarken Richard MarkenI said: like MAGA, there is just nothing right about FEP. I should have said that there is nothing about FEP that is right as a model of the behavior of living systems. But since your interest in AI is in providing it with a basis for “reality testing”, FEP may be more relevant to […]
- by @rsmarken Richard MarkenLukasz20: Rick — you’re right, and I’d rather say so plainly than manage it. “Powers had the loop closed while the field was still drawing straight lines” is wrong, and wrong in the way that matters. Closed-loop models were in the behavioral sciences from the manual-control work of the late forties, more than a decade […]
- by @Lukasz20 LukRick — you’re right, and I’d rather say so plainly than manage it. “Powers had the loop closed while the field was still drawing straight lines” is wrong, and wrong in the way that matters. Closed-loop models were in the behavioral sciences from the manual-control work of the late forties, more than a decade before […]
- by @rsmarken Richard MarkenHi Luk You might not want me to be a reviewer of your BBS paper (if it gets accepted) after reading the following. But you might as well know how I feel about the relationship between FEP and PCT before recommending me as a commentator. You said: Lukasz20: On your [Warren’s] last point — why […]